3 Cardinals and a bishop now challenging - Amoris Laetitia

The fall out from the Pope's document, "Amoris Laetitia" continues unabated, and now has 3 cardinals and a bishop, openly challenging the mulitiple heresies contained in the document. Professor Josef Seifert  says the danger of schism in the Catholic Church now seems likely, if the heresies are not removed. The 3 cardinals are; Cardinal Pujats (Latvia), Cardinal Caffarra (Bologna) and Cardinal Burke (Vatican). The bishop is Bishop Schneider (Kazakhstan).

Please click on the link to see the article, with the list of signatories.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/please-sign-declaration-of-fidelity-to-the-churchs-unchangeable-teaching-on

Francis goes against ALL the past popes and the Bible! How muchlonger Oh Lord, how much longer!

Last October 2015 I had the great opportunity of interviewiing 80 year old Father Michael Clifton, former archivist and historian of Southwark Diocese. My article was published in Catholic Life Magazine. At the time, the Pope and the cardinals were conducting part 2 of the "Sinnod on the Family".

Father Michael said that if the Pope allowed Holy Communion for the divorced and remarried - it would make him a heretic. Look at the photo of my article - where I have highlighted his exact words. And why is this such a "big deal"? Well because allowing communion to people in adulterous unions tells them they are no longer in a state of objective mortal sin. The implications are huge - and the 6th Commandment is effectively tossed into the bin.

Well that day has come - the pope has over-turned 2000 years of Church teaching - as confirmed by the Vatican official newspaper the "L'Osservatore Romano", on 13th or 14th September 2016. (The Vatican newspaper confirmed a letter written by the Pope to the Argentianian bishops telling them to go ahead and give communion to those in second unions).

So there we are folks! 

Well for my part I have decided I will only obey previous popes and the Bible from now on.

Non Serviam Francis! Non Serviam

This is a very dark time for the Catholic Church.

Hard evidence of the Vatican cover-up of the sex-abuse of children, seminarians and young priests.

Randy Engel - investigative journalist of the pedophile and pederast scandals in the Catholic Church, sent me this link. It is concrete proof of the systematic cover up of the sex-abuse of children, seminarians and young priests in the Church, from the highest echelons of the Vatican.  Mrs Engel says Archbishop Nienstedt and those complicit in his crimes - must be turned over to the police and defrocked. 

The video is just under an hour.

https://youtu.be/ujj_2Q2Jiig

British police whistleblower on corruption in police - regarding child abuse and other horrors

This is an interview between UK column news and one very brave policeman - who blew the whistle on what is really going on within care homes for children, and how the police can't deal properly with the crimes, due to 'higher authorites'. Credit must go to this independent news source - who tell it how it is.

https://youtu.be/Y_sDeTCLVDQ

More Catholic academics rise up against "Amoris Laetitia"

This is a video of around 29 minutes - with a number of speakers including Bishop Athanasiis Schneider - pointing out the catastrophic dangers in the Pope's document

https://youtu.be/nQpJqmbYPXg

Catholic academics rising up against the recent papal document- "Amoris Laetitia"

Go to the Latin Mass Society blog and see the latest post by chairman Joseph Shaw, which is getting global attention, regarding the heresies in the Pope's latest document. 

//www.lmschairman.org/2016/07/catholic-academics-and-pastors-appeal.html

One transsexual's regret

I started training with the Citizens Advice Bureau earlier this year as I wanted something interesting and useful to do while my son was at school. At the interview I was asked if there were any situations I wouldn't be able to deal with and I was pretty upfront - thinking that this would be 'curtains' for me. I stated plainly - that if someone came in and wanted to get an abortion or the "morning after pill" I would not in conscience be able to help them. The interviewer said - "we have never been asked that before". So I was accepted.

Working at the CAB is an eye opener as each person who comes for advice has a unique problem - no two are the same.

Anyway - one person who came in was a transsexual - 'she' was very open about this and how it had destroyed 'her' life. The issue 'she' came in with, was to do with benefits.  Due to the operation 'going spectacularly wrong' - which was on the NHS, this person couldn't manage to hold down a job. The sex-change operation was in 'her' eyes a "disaster". She had been pressurised to go "the full monty" by the surgeon, rather than a half-way house operation. I got the grisly details which I will spare this blog!

'She' said if she had known all this, she would have just carried on being a cross-dresser which wouldn't have involved a full scale operation. ‘She’ said the hormone pills had terrible side-effects and she had to stop taking them. ‘She’ also said the public only get to hear about the "successful ones" - and that there is no voice for those, when it has gone badly wrong. ‘She’ wanted to tell her story so that others don't follow this path. ‘She’ also said she was worried about schools now telling primary school children they have to think about their genders - putting ideas into their heads! ‘She’ thought this was downright dangerous. ‘She’ says she thinks the sex-change operations should be banned. 

Letter to the hierarchy of the Catholic Church

I

Does Benedict promote the subtle Christological heresy that Jesusis not God?

I write this on Trinity Sunday 2016

Something odd happened to me in 2005, which scared me and gave me goosebumps. 

Why on earth am I writing about something that happened to me over 10 years ago? Because a few days ago, the Vatican issued a communique to the world, saying that Pope Benedict has denied having a conversation with Proffessor Dollinger regarding the Third Secret of Fatima. Apparently  Proffessor Dollinger said that Cardinal Ratziger told him that the unrevealed part of the Third Secret is to do with a bad Council and a bad Mass. Steve Skojec's latest post on OnePeter5 is about this new revelation by Proffessor  Dollinger, and it has gone so viral that it got the Vatican's attention. So this quick communication from the Vatican shows a nervousness on their part, to issue such a strong statement on behalf of Pope Benedict. So, who is lying? The Vatican, Pope Benedict or Proff Dollinger. I don't think the latter is lying.

So back to my past. While I was studying in my second year at Maryvale Institute in February 2005 for the part time BA Divinity, and while Pope John Paul II was still alive, I was perturbed to read a book by the then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. It was called "God and the World - A conversation with Peter Seewald", Ignatius Press, 2000. It was in a question and answer format. It has been a best seller I believe.

On page 294, Peter Seewald asks Cardinal Ratzinger about Mary being the mother of God, and the Cardinal replies, "obviously she is not God's mother in the sense of His having come from her. But she was in the sense of having been the mother of that man who was entirely at one with God." Now I remember re-reading and re-reading the last part and red flags were popping up all over my head, and I felt a quickening of my heart-beat inside. Anyway, I wrote to my tutor, that wonderful canon lawyer - Father John Redwood (RIP). I quoted the troubling sentence to him. He wrote back, "I agree with you. Ratzinger's statement that Mary was the mother of that man who was entirely at one with God" is ambiguous. She was the mother of the man who WAS God!" The ever so subtle and  carefully worded answer from Cardinal Ratzinger is a Christological heresy denying that Jesus Christ IS God! So, does Pope Benedict believe that Jesus is God? It would seem not - according to his reply to Mr Seewald. 

Another interesting article on Pope Benedict's theology was written by late Father Luigi Villa in December 2011, where he critiques a book by Pope Benedict, called, "The God of Jesus Christ" - the title alone gives the heebie jeebies! That title alone says that Jesus is NOT God. Here is the link - please read it! So if this is the case, then Pope Benedict is a subtle Arian. No one has picked up on this except Fr Villa - who held a doctorate in theology.

http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/A_return_to_paganism-final-1.pdf

Another interesting podcast I listened to today was a criticism of Catholic bloggers who blog anonymously. And there are many of them! Good writing and all that, but they hide behind anonymity. I blog under my real name and yes it has got me into 'trouble' of course it has! I have lost friends yes. My blog eventually caused me to leave Opus Dei. But I refuse to be anonymous. 

There is a lot of nostalgia for Pope Benedict, while Pope Francis causes havoc with his many plane interviews and apostolic exhortations. But this nostalgia is quite odd IF Pope Benedict is a crypto Arian.

This non Catholic man is calling Francis to act like a pope.

A very short video by a non Catholic - who actually makes really good points. It seems that Pope Francis is comparing Our Lord and Saviour to the extremist ISIS group! If that's the case then how dare he blaspheme God! That is beyond the pale. I mean if Amoris blooming what not wasn't bad enough!

Dear Lord please spare us from this Pope! I beg you.

Of course it was Cardinal Pell who said that we have had 47 antepopes in the history of the Catholic Church. Was he implying that Pope Francis might be no 48? Otherwise why would he have come out with that fact out of the blue?! I mean the cardinal just blurted it out. It was totally out of context too.

Only 3 minutes long.

Anonymous comments are not usually published

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-YXOT0HtCE&feature=share

John Smeaton of SPUC on fire in this video - demanding the immediate withdrawal of the Pope's document - Amoris Laetitia

John Smeaton is head of SPUC - the Society for the protection of unborn children. The charity has supporters from all faiths and none. 

Among other things it highlights the moral evil of the contraceptive mentality so prevalent in our culture. The natural law pre-dates all religions, and contraception goes against the natural law, by separating the procreative from the unitive. 

The society also exposes the  insidious sex education in schools, which crush our children's innocence. Even many Catholic schools promote a values-free sex education agenda. Catholics now contracept, abort, co-habit, divorce, use IVF, enter into same-sex marriage, as much as non-Catholics. This was never the case before 1965. Unfortunately our Catholic hierarchy including the Vatican have been impotent in stemming this tide of hedonistic behaviour amongst its flock.

Sorry to say but the latest document from Pope Francis has drawn the line in the sand. It is a horrific document and possibly - in my opinion, the most dangerous piece of writing from any pope past or present. A retired priest said on Sunday that the title says it all - Amoris Laetitia really means, "The Joy of Sex" and that we must not follow it! He described it in his sermon as "weird".

So I will stop banging on and just say do watch this incredible video of John Smeaton, who passionately asks the pope to withdraw this dangerous document as of immediate effect.

John Smeaton has also said it is now time for the laity to rise up and form a resistance movement - I have joined. I encourage you to join.

https://youtu.be/y8wp2s_J4IA

Anonymous comments are not usually printed

Date of the conference in Rome, to condemn the heresies in Amoris Laetitia - 25th June 2016

This conference is taking place on Saturday 25th June in Rome. The venue isn't known yet as the numbers of people attending are not known.

I am hoping to attend. 

Brother Alexis Bugnolo - former Franciscan Friar of the Immaculata is organising this event, as he currently resides in Rome.

Useful website - post Amoris Laetitia

I am sure my blog has lost me many friends - that is par for the course when you write controversial articles. But I don't do this blog to be popular!

This is a website which I find useful, and I am sure I will lose more friends. Too bad.

We live in unprecedented times in the Catholic Church.

God help us!



www.biblefalseprophet.com

Conference in Rome to show the heresies in Amoris Laetitia

This vital event is being organised by Brother Alexis Bugnolo


https://vericatholici.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/invitation-to-international-conference-to-condemn-amoris-laetitia/

Novos Ordo Watch website

After the ambigous document which Pope Francis produced in early April 2016, something occurred to me. Popes are not supposed to produce ambigous documents - popes are meant to clarify teachings not muddy the waters. Many church men and well known Catholic journalists are doing flip flops trying to explain this document - "Amoris Laetitia". It's civil war in the Catholic Church and it's going to get nasty. Cardinal Burke says this document is not part of the infallible teaching office, so basically he is saying in the politest way, that we can ignore this document. Other cardinals like Shonborn are saying that it is a marvellous radical departure and a "linguistic event" - whatever that means! 

Of course Vatcan 2 was a language event too. If you read the documents you will notice they are written in a new language, and indeed these can be read in both a heterodox way and an orthodox way - think of the 2 pronged fork analogy.

 But church documents should be clear NOT ambiguous. Before Vatican 2, church documents were crystal clear. I urge readers to compare documents before and after 1962.

A very good website has many good articles about the changes in the church since the close of the Second Vatican Council. It is called Novos Ordo Watch.

Before this awful document came out I would have hesitated to promote this website, but after much prayer and discernment I am going to put the address here. I have to admit I don't know what's going on in the Catholic Church - are the liberals right? I don't know, they might be. Are the conservatives right? I don't know, they might be. Are the SSPX right? I don't know, they might be. Are the sedevacantists right? I don't know, they might be. But all I do know, is that God has allowed this confusion and infighting in His Church for a considerable amount of time, for reasons I don't know why, but hopefully one day we will know the reasons. I cling to the daily rosary and my scapular medal and pray pray pray for this diabolical confusion to end.

novosordowatch.org

Another good one is padrepioandchiesaviva.com

Anonymous comments are not usually printed.

Golly! Even EWTN are criticising the Pope's document Amoris Laetitia.

Good for Raymond Arroyo in this. They are presenting the serious errors in the Pope's recent apostolic exhortation "Amoris Laetitia". 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=E5Avd7bCiV0

Venerable Archbishop Sheen said the false prophet would be a Catholic bishop

Please watch this 4 minute utube - which quotes Archbishop Fulton Sheen - on the subject of both antichrist and the biblical false prophet - by the way - these characters are not myths - they have been taught infallibly in the Catholic Church. There really will be 2 men, 1 the false prophet, and the other the antichrist.

The narrator cites his source - which is a book, and states the name and pages quoted.

http://youtu.be/gmmESCWl8Co

Amorous document - AKA Amoris Laetitia

I'm I am not going to write much on this now rather infamous document by Pope Francis. Excellent bloggers have already written brilliant insights - Italian journalist Antonio Socci has written a very apt piece, Sandro Magister and Roberto de Mattei are others who offer good insights.

This document which is the size of a novel apparently, has been 3 years in preparation. It is the result of the 2 Synods at the Vatican. None of us should be surprised at its contents, which are being interpreted in wildly different ways.

No we should not be surprised at all. It is the natural child of Vatican 2, which was also interpreted in wildly different ways, from very liberal to conservative, depending on one's viewpoint. No council in the history of the Catholic Church has EVER had different interpretations, because every council prior to Vatican 2 was written in clear language, without ambigous sophistries.

The bottom line of this entire document can be summed up in one paragraph.

This document is really about the elevation of the cult of man and how man's conscience can be his supreme judge in all matters of his behaviour. This document does away with sin and the 10 Commandments of God. It is actually an insult to God our Creator. It is a most outrageous offence to God. It uses obfuscated language and mixes truth with lies - a wicked cocktail - with deadly consequences for souls. It enshrines the whole masonic principle, that man is his own god, and if his conscience says he can break the 6th Commandment, then he can go ahead and break the 6th Commandment. There are some good parts in the document but frankly the ambiguities and "nods and winks" in it kill it for me!

That is all.

Anonymous comments are not published.

Whistleblower talks about "child stealing" by social services

This video is less than an hour, and it is rather shocking. Carol - the interviewee talks about how children's documents are deliberately altered so that they can be taken away from their real parents, and given to childless couples. She was sacked from her job as a social worker, as she wouldn't go along with altering facts on the forms. These stolen children are called "children to order".

It is outrageous that this sort of thing is happening. It's wicked and evil. Carol is extremely brave - having endured a barrage of attacks from fellow workers, simply because she refused to lie on these children's forms.

I remember that journalist Christopher Booker has written about this in his column.

http://youtu.be/CN8dvWXyK-s

Excellent utube on why the cult of "pope worship" is utterly wrong

I don't usually promote the Michael Voris videos, but I do watch them, as he has some interesting and intelligent speakers on. 

This video is actually rather good and to the point.

Unfortunately since  Saint Pope John Paul II was elected, there has been a cult of "pope worship" - especially as he was the first pope to really travel the world, and he started these err World Youth Days, which made him into a media savvy "pop star". However, I have to say it was Pope John Paul 2 who made me realise how mortally sinful artificial birth control is, so I owe him a lot! I took my faith seriously when he was alive.

Sadly the way saints are made now is questionable, since the 'devil's advocate' was binned years ago. I am not that certain if I believe in all the newest saints, so I prefer to venerate the saints who were elevated in the correct way - that is, with a proper devil's advocate. Suffice to say I think Pope John Paul II was canonised far too quickly - revisionist historians are already finding evidence of some very  questionable things he said, did and wrote.  Needlesstosay there was no devil's advocate for Pope John Paul II. I find that disturbing.

So this video is good, as Michael Voris is correctly saying that no one has to hang on every utterance a pope makes and popes do say wrong things and even don't know their doctrine sometimes! So when a pope says something which brings up a 'red flag' just check the Denzinger book on Catholic dogma, and if a pope contradicts it, then he must in all charity be ignored! And charitably corrected too.

Did you know that in the past we have had popes who raped and murdered victims, one fathered several children! So let us strive to end this ridiculous cult of papalotria every time the pope opens his mouth! Especially on blooming planes! For everyone's sake!

Enjoy the utube!

http://youtu.be/tcge7eppKo4

Picture of a cake shop in Seville during Holy Week

A good talk on the madness of commemorating Luther - enemy of Catholicism

Michael Matt and Chris Ferrara give a brilliant analysis on why they think Pope Francis should not be celebrating the 500 year anniversary of Martin Luther's break with the Catholic Church. This duo are like 2 prophets in the hideous confusing wilderness of the "goings on" in Rome.

And what does Michael Voris of the Church Militant Apostolate think? And is Jimmy Akin going to do his "10 good things to learn and know about Martin Luther and the Deformation, sorry reformation?" 

Cuckoo cuckoo

It lasts under half an hour.

http://youtu.be/-W85Mair6Uc

Short documentary on changes to the Catholic Church since Vatican 2

A very interesting and informative 45 minute documentary on the changes which occurred in the Catholic Church since Vatican 2.

Whether or not you agree with any, some, or all of it, it certainly encourages debate. I am open minded about the charges in it. However, some of the charges are too generalised.

Disquieting at the same time. 

http://youtu.be/hJxM7Lo2URw

It's the sort of thing you can listen to while ironing.