Novos Ordo Watch website

After the ambigous document which Pope Francis produced in early April 2016, something occurred to me. Popes are not supposed to produce ambigous documents - popes are meant to clarify teachings not muddy the waters. Many church men and well known Catholic journalists are doing flip flops trying to explain this document - "Amoris Laetitia". It's civil war in the Catholic Church and it's going to get nasty. Cardinal Burke says this document is not part of the infallible teaching office, so basically he is saying in the politest way, that we can ignore this document. Other cardinals like Shonborn are saying that it is a marvellous radical departure and a "linguistic event" - whatever that means! 

Of course Vatcan 2 was a language event too. If you read the documents you will notice they are written in a new language, and indeed these can be read in both a heterodox way and an orthodox way - think of the 2 pronged fork analogy.

 But church documents should be clear NOT ambiguous. Before Vatican 2, church documents were crystal clear. I urge readers to compare documents before and after 1962.

A very good website has many good articles about the changes in the church since the close of the Second Vatican Council. It is called Novos Ordo Watch.

Before this awful document came out I would have hesitated to promote this website, but after much prayer and discernment I am going to put the address here. I have to admit I don't know what's going on in the Catholic Church - are the liberals right? I don't know, they might be. Are the conservatives right? I don't know, they might be. Are the SSPX right? I don't know, they might be. Are the sedevacantists right? I don't know, they might be. But all I do know, is that God has allowed this confusion and infighting in His Church for a considerable amount of time, for reasons I don't know why, but hopefully one day we will know the reasons. I cling to the daily rosary and my scapular medal and pray pray pray for this diabolical confusion to end.

novosordowatch.org

Another good one is padrepioandchiesaviva.com

Anonymous comments are not usually printed.

Golly! Even EWTN are criticising the Pope's document Amoris Laetitia.

Good for Raymond Arroyo in this. They are presenting the serious errors in the Pope's recent apostolic exhortation "Amoris Laetitia". 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=E5Avd7bCiV0

Venerable Archbishop Sheen said the false prophet would be a Catholic bishop

Please watch this 4 minute utube - which quotes Archbishop Fulton Sheen - on the subject of both antichrist and the biblical false prophet - by the way - these characters are not myths - they have been taught infallibly in the Catholic Church. There really will be 2 men, 1 the false prophet, and the other the antichrist.

The narrator cites his source - which is a book, and states the name and pages quoted.

http://youtu.be/gmmESCWl8Co

Amorous document - AKA Amoris Laetitia

I'm I am not going to write much on this now rather infamous document by Pope Francis. Excellent bloggers have already written brilliant insights - Italian journalist Antonio Socci has written a very apt piece, Sandro Magister and Roberto de Mattei are others who offer good insights.

This document which is the size of a novel apparently, has been 3 years in preparation. It is the result of the 2 Synods at the Vatican. None of us should be surprised at its contents, which are being interpreted in wildly different ways.

No we should not be surprised at all. It is the natural child of Vatican 2, which was also interpreted in wildly different ways, from very liberal to conservative, depending on one's viewpoint. No council in the history of the Catholic Church has EVER had different interpretations, because every council prior to Vatican 2 was written in clear language, without ambigous sophistries.

The bottom line of this entire document can be summed up in one paragraph.

This document is really about the elevation of the cult of man and how man's conscience can be his supreme judge in all matters of his behaviour. This document does away with sin and the 10 Commandments of God. It is actually an insult to God our Creator. It is a most outrageous offence to God. It uses obfuscated language and mixes truth with lies - a wicked cocktail - with deadly consequences for souls. It enshrines the whole masonic principle, that man is his own god, and if his conscience says he can break the 6th Commandment, then he can go ahead and break the 6th Commandment. There are some good parts in the document but frankly the ambiguities and "nods and winks" in it kill it for me!

That is all.

Anonymous comments are not published.

Whistleblower talks about "child stealing" by social services

This video is less than an hour, and it is rather shocking. Carol - the interviewee talks about how children's documents are deliberately altered so that they can be taken away from their real parents, and given to childless couples. She was sacked from her job as a social worker, as she wouldn't go along with altering facts on the forms. These stolen children are called "children to order".

It is outrageous that this sort of thing is happening. It's wicked and evil. Carol is extremely brave - having endured a barrage of attacks from fellow workers, simply because she refused to lie on these children's forms.

I remember that journalist Christopher Booker has written about this in his column.

http://youtu.be/CN8dvWXyK-s

Excellent utube on why the cult of "pope worship" is utterly wrong

I don't usually promote the Michael Voris videos, but I do watch them, as he has some interesting and intelligent speakers on. 

This video is actually rather good and to the point.

Unfortunately since  Saint Pope John Paul II was elected, there has been a cult of "pope worship" - especially as he was the first pope to really travel the world, and he started these err World Youth Days, which made him into a media savvy "pop star". However, I have to say it was Pope John Paul 2 who made me realise how mortally sinful artificial birth control is, so I owe him a lot! I took my faith seriously when he was alive.

Sadly the way saints are made now is questionable, since the 'devil's advocate' was binned years ago. I am not that certain if I believe in all the newest saints, so I prefer to venerate the saints who were elevated in the correct way - that is, with a proper devil's advocate. Suffice to say I think Pope John Paul II was canonised far too quickly - revisionist historians are already finding evidence of some very  questionable things he said, did and wrote.  Needlesstosay there was no devil's advocate for Pope John Paul II. I find that disturbing.

So this video is good, as Michael Voris is correctly saying that no one has to hang on every utterance a pope makes and popes do say wrong things and even don't know their doctrine sometimes! So when a pope says something which brings up a 'red flag' just check the Denzinger book on Catholic dogma, and if a pope contradicts it, then he must in all charity be ignored! And charitably corrected too.

Did you know that in the past we have had popes who raped and murdered victims, one fathered several children! So let us strive to end this ridiculous cult of papalotria every time the pope opens his mouth! Especially on blooming planes! For everyone's sake!

Enjoy the utube!

http://youtu.be/tcge7eppKo4

Picture of a cake shop in Seville during Holy Week

A good talk on the madness of commemorating Luther - enemy of Catholicism

Michael Matt and Chris Ferrara give a brilliant analysis on why they think Pope Francis should not be celebrating the 500 year anniversary of Martin Luther's break with the Catholic Church. This duo are like 2 prophets in the hideous confusing wilderness of the "goings on" in Rome.

And what does Michael Voris of the Church Militant Apostolate think? And is Jimmy Akin going to do his "10 good things to learn and know about Martin Luther and the Deformation, sorry reformation?" 

Cuckoo cuckoo

It lasts under half an hour.

http://youtu.be/-W85Mair6Uc